The indicator reveals whether the (average) contract duration of a contracting authority/company is significantly longer than the overall (average) contract duration, with reference to post-emergency contracts belonging to relevant economic market.
Motivation
The red flag considers at risk contracting authorities/companies with post-emergency contracts whose excessive duration is not justified by the nature of the crisis, that is, contracts longer than the overall average duration of contracts won after the emergency outbreak.
Scoring rule
The computation procedure returns 1 - p-value of the involved test - Wilcoxon test in this case - (so that high values of
the indicator correspond to high levels of corruption risk). When computing the composite,
it will be dichotomised to 1 if statistical test is significant, and 0 otherwise (see normalise()
).
Arguments
- data
a dataframe containing the data to use for computing the indicator.
- publication_date
name of the variable in
data
containing the publication date of each contract.- stat_unit
name of the variable in
data
containing the target unit ID (in this case, company or contracting authority).- eff_start
name of the variable in
data
containing the effective start date of each contract.- eff_end
name of the variable in
data
containing the contract execution effective end date.- emergency_name
string specifying the name of the emergency to consider. Examples could include "Coronavirus" or "Terremoto Centro Italia 2016-2017".
- ...
other parameters to pass to
generate_indicator_schema()
, such ascountry_name
(default: Italy).
Value
indicator schema as from generate_indicator_schema()
.
Examples
if (FALSE) {
if (interactive()) {
ind_9(
data = mock_data_core,
publication_date = data_pubblicazione,
stat_unit = cf_amministrazione_appaltante,
eff_start = data_inizio_effettiva,
eff_end = data_effettiva_ultimazione,
emergency_name = "coronavirus"
)
}
}